Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oiseau Bay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oiseau Bay

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NGEO, but more importantly, the article is actually more about a non-notable resort, so also fails WP:NCORP. The "Advert" tag on top of the page has been there for 10 years! P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:10, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Quebec. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:10, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:29, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As noted, the topic here is a cross between "small river inlet of strictly local notability that hasn't been shown to pass WP:NGEO" and "advertorialized profile of a rental cottage resort located on that inlet", and neither of those things are properly referenced as notable at all. Bearcat (talk) 14:33, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above; also, fails my standards for notable places. Every resort claims to be the best or most luxurious. This is barely disguised spam. Bearian (talk) 19:05, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.